<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Helvetica</title>
	<atom:link href="http://bkwld.com/blog/2008/04/helvetica/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://bkwld.com/blog/2008/04/helvetica/</link>
	<description>The blog from the staff of BKWLD</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 01 May 2012 11:14:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Vicki</title>
		<link>http://bkwld.com/blog/2008/04/helvetica/comment-page-1/#comment-2391</link>
		<dc:creator>Vicki</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Apr 2008 18:37:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://team.bkwld.com/2008/04/04/helvetica/#comment-2391</guid>
		<description>i agree w/ jeff that it&#039;s difficult to choose one movement over another - the best thing about modern design is that more than ever, people are willing to make new rules to better execute the message/campaign. what makes helvetica so amazing is of course, it&#039;s composition, balance, and neutrality - but on the flipside, you have people like carson who are trying to forge something different and make people look at something as typical as typography in a completely new way. part of carson&#039;s uniqueness and the reason i admire him is his ability to take the neutral and totally destroy it / make it into something very evocative by deconstructing its basic components. it&#039;s almost like a throwback to the arts &amp; crafts movement. how do we make something look handmade, or individualistic, full of expression and meaning, in a completely sterilized digital world?

personally i think the challenge today isn&#039;t making something new or following the set path, but finding an aesthetically pleasing balance between art &amp; functionality. what i love over anything else is a design that is unexpected, not necessarily new or classic - just something that works, but surprises me. a good design doesn&#039;t have to break the rules or forge new ones, it&#039;s all about bending and shifting. people are really jaded and i think it&#039;s our job as designers to renew people&#039;s faith in the medium of visual communication.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i agree w/ jeff that it&#8217;s difficult to choose one movement over another &#8211; the best thing about modern design is that more than ever, people are willing to make new rules to better execute the message/campaign. what makes helvetica so amazing is of course, it&#8217;s composition, balance, and neutrality &#8211; but on the flipside, you have people like carson who are trying to forge something different and make people look at something as typical as typography in a completely new way. part of carson&#8217;s uniqueness and the reason i admire him is his ability to take the neutral and totally destroy it / make it into something very evocative by deconstructing its basic components. it&#8217;s almost like a throwback to the arts &amp; crafts movement. how do we make something look handmade, or individualistic, full of expression and meaning, in a completely sterilized digital world?</p>
<p>personally i think the challenge today isn&#8217;t making something new or following the set path, but finding an aesthetically pleasing balance between art &amp; functionality. what i love over anything else is a design that is unexpected, not necessarily new or classic &#8211; just something that works, but surprises me. a good design doesn&#8217;t have to break the rules or forge new ones, it&#8217;s all about bending and shifting. people are really jaded and i think it&#8217;s our job as designers to renew people&#8217;s faith in the medium of visual communication.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

